Home/r/aiagents/#7948
68

Anyone else feel like GPT-5 is actually a massive downgrade? My honest experience after 24 hours of pain...

r/aiagents
8/15/2025

Content Summary

The post discusses the author's negative experience with the new GPT-5 model from OpenAI, which they feel is a step backward compared to GPT-4. Key issues include slower response times, no model selection, and a weekly message limit, all while maintaining the same subscription price. Users in the comments express mixed opinions: some find GPT-5 to be more accurate and thoughtful, especially for complex coding tasks, while others are frustrated by its performance and limitations. Alternatives like Claude, GPT-4o, and other AI tools are mentioned as potential solutions.

Opinion Analysis

Mainstream opinion leans toward frustration with GPT-5, particularly among developers who rely on fast and flexible AI tools. Many users feel that OpenAI has removed key features without adding meaningful improvements. However, some users believe that GPT-5 offers better accuracy and depth, especially for complex coding tasks. There is also debate about whether the slowdown is due to cost-saving measures rather than actual improvements. Some users suggest alternatives like Claude or GPT-4o, while others argue that GPT-5 is still useful for certain tasks. Overall, the discussion highlights a divide between those who prioritize speed and flexibility and those who prefer deeper reasoning and accuracy.

SAAS TOOLS

SaaSURLCategoryFeatures/Notes
ChatGPThttps://chat.openai.comAI AssistantModel switching, faster responses, no usage limits
Claudehttps://www.anthropic.comAI AssistantBetter code generation for some users
GPT-4o-AI AssistantFaster than GPT-5, available in settings
Sonnet 4-AI AssistantUsed as an alternative to GPT-5
Codex CLI-Code Generation ToolMore suited for coding tasks than chat model
Cursor-IDE with LLM IntegrationUsed for code generation and debugging
Groc-Text Editing ToolUsed for checking duplicated words and errors

USER NEEDS

Pain Points:

  • Slower response times with GPT-5
  • No choice of models
  • Weekly message limit
  • Same price with fewer features
  • Lack of reliability for work tasks

Problems to Solve:

  • Need for a fast, reliable AI assistant for coding and development
  • Desire for flexibility in model selection
  • Avoiding arbitrary usage limits
  • Getting more value for the subscription fee

Potential Solutions:

  • Switching to alternatives like Claude or GPT-4o
  • Using CLI tools or IDEs with integrated LLMs
  • Reverting to older models if possible
  • Exploring other AI platforms like Cursor or Groc

GROWTH FACTORS

Effective Strategies:

  • Offering multiple model options to cater to different user needs
  • Providing fast and efficient responses to maintain user satisfaction
  • Allowing flexibility in tool usage to increase user retention

Marketing & Acquisition:

  • Leveraging user dissatisfaction to drive adoption of competing products
  • Highlighting specific use cases where competitors outperform (e.g., code generation)

Monetization & Product:

  • Maintaining the same pricing despite reduced features can lead to user churn
  • Removing model options may reduce perceived value and user loyalty
  • Adding limitations without clear benefits can harm product-market fit

User Engagement:

  • Building communities around alternative tools (e.g., Claude, GPT-4o)
  • Encouraging user experimentation with different AI models to find the best fit