20
Content Summary
The post argues that current AI interaction resembles the MS-DOS era of computing, with primitive user interfaces. The author believes the future of AI UX hasn't been invented yet. Comments reveal projects like npcsh (positioned as Linux equivalent) and a 'Thinking OS' that aims to create intent-driven partnerships. Discussions include comparisons to Windows 95 era and predictions about voice/brain interfaces.
Opinion Analysis
Mainstream opinion agrees AI UX is primitive but differs on the analogy: some say MS-DOS level (OP), others argue it's more advanced like Windows 95. Conflicting views exist on solutions: some advocate for voice commands (Helpful_Fall7732), others for OS-level overhauls (Hopeful-Rhubarb-1436). Projects like npcsh and 'Thinking OS' represent competing approaches to improving AI interaction. Debate centers on whether evolution (better chatbots) or revolution (new paradigms) is needed.
SAAS TOOLS
| SaaS | URL | Category | Features/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| npcsh | https://github.com/NPC-Worldwide/npcsh | AI Operating System | Voice commands via yap |
USER NEEDS
Pain Points:
- AI interaction feels outdated like MS-DOS
- Chatbot interfaces are command-line driven
- Lack of proactive, intent-driven systems
Problems to Solve:
- Modernizing AI user experience
- Creating intuitive interfaces beyond chatbots
- Developing AI that works with users as partners
Potential Solutions:
- Voice/brain command interfaces
- Proactive 'Thinking OS' that augments intelligence
- Intent-driven partnership models
GROWTH FACTORS
Effective Strategies:
- Building public projects for visibility (Kaggle challenge)
- Open-source development for community adoption
Marketing & Acquisition:
- GitHub repository sharing
- Public building for community engagement
Monetization & Product:
- Focus on local-first systems
- Developing OS-level solutions
User Engagement:
- Community building through GitHub
- Public development transparency